The Definition of ‘Norm Conflict’ in International Law and Legal Theory
نویسنده
چکیده
This article argues that the narrow definition of conflict apparently prevailing in international law doctrine and recent WTO rulings is inappropriate in terms of legal theory and in view of the fundamental structures of the international legal order. The problem with this strict definition is that it does not recognize that a permissive norm may conflict with a prescriptive norm. In this perspective, established conflict rules such as the lex posterior and lex specialis principles cannot be applied in order to determine whether a permissive norm (such as a WTO exception or an MEA permission to restrict trade) actually constitutes the lex posterior or the lex specialis which was meant to prevail by the contracting parties. Further problems in recent academic writings and WTO jurisprudence have been caused by an insufficient distinction between norms of conduct and norms establishing competences. This paper therefore shows that an adequate definition has to encompass incompatibilities between prescriptive norms as well as permissive norms and concludes that an appropriate definition should rely on the ‘test of violation’ first introduced by Kelsen.
منابع مشابه
Adopting New International Health Instruments – What Can We Learn From the FCTC?; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”
This Commentary forms a response to Nikogosian’s and Kickbusch’s forward-looking perspective about the legal strength of international health instruments. Building on their arguments, in this commentary we consider what we can learn from the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) for the adoption of new legal international health instruments.
متن کاملچالشهای اخلاقی حمایت از روشهای علم پزشکی در حقوق اختراعات
Human inventions and innovations are generally subject to legal protection but some of these innovations are not subject to legal protection. Medical methods are one of the controversial exceptions of patentability of inventions and opponents and proponents of patent ability of medical methods support propound several reasons to prove their theory. While major arguments of proponents are justif...
متن کاملexamining the concept of a subset of institutions and monitor the quality of leadership in the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran
"Leadership Undertakings" is a term used in many common rules and is an exception to the rule. However, the definition and examples of this term are ambiguous and generally a broad interpretation is made of it. Whereas it is desirable, firstly, to adopt a specific criterion in the definition of these institutions in order to make it possible to account for its constituents and, secondly, to exc...
متن کاملI-13: Therapeutic Abortion Law in Iran: Past,Present and Future
s:2987:"Although the definition of abortion is pregnancy loss under 20 weeks of gestational age, in Islamic law, termination pregnancy in any gestational age is considered abortion "SEGHT JANIN". Also only "induced abortion" has legal validity, and other kinds of miscarriage (recurrent, missed,…) have no legal or ethical issue. In Iran, Islam is the base of the law. Article 4 of Iran constituti...
متن کاملدادگاه صالح در ورشکستگی فراسرزمینی ( بین المللی) (مطالعه تطبیقی در حقوق ایران، آمریکا و قانون نمونه آنسیترال 1977)
Increasingly improvements in foreign commerce have promoted trading exchanges and merchants conclude different commercial contract in international level. However, they may fail in executing their financial commitment in such transactions and experience insolvency due to losses or happening different events. Therefore, international insolvency phenomenon especially a competent court to proceed ...
متن کامل